From 1fc8facb29b09e21b1930e7c4d2d9807feb028df Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "jim_nance%yahoo.com" Date: Mon, 29 May 2000 19:31:29 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Updated docs to reflect Red Hat 6.2 testing git-svn-id: svn://10.0.0.236/trunk@71051 18797224-902f-48f8-a5cc-f745e15eee43 --- mozilla/tools/jprof/README.html | 11 ++++++----- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/mozilla/tools/jprof/README.html b/mozilla/tools/jprof/README.html index 36dbc72640d..a26178770bf 100644 --- a/mozilla/tools/jprof/README.html +++ b/mozilla/tools/jprof/README.html @@ -153,11 +153,12 @@ and nsWidget::DispatchMouseEvent was in the call stack it was calling nsWidget::DispatchWindowEvent.

Bugs

-Currently jprof has only been tested under Red Hat Linux 6.1. It is known -to not work under Red Hat Linux 6.0. The way I determine the stack trace -from inside the signal handler is tightly bound to the version of glibc -that is running. If you know of a more portable way to get this information -please let me know. +Jprof has only been tested under Red Hat Linux 6.0, 6.1, and 6.2. It does +not work under 6.0, though it is possible hack up the source code and make +it work there. The way I determine the stack trace from inside the +signal handler is tightly bound to the version of glibc that is running. +If you know of a more portable way to get this information please let +me know.

Update

Ben Bucksch reports that installing the Red Hat 6.1 glibc rpms on a Red Hat 6.0 system allows jprof to work, and does not seem to break anything except