> Norris Boyd wrote:
>
> Igor Bukaniv wrote:
> >
> > I am curios, why there is a need to have a special JSObject support in Rhino? Was it used for anything? The implementation in the ICEbrowser does not use it as in rare cases where conversion from JSObject to/from JS type may be needed (like calling JSObject.getWindow from a script), it seems that WrapHandler (or similar modifications to pre Rhino 1.5R2 sources) and Wrapper are enough to cover all the cases.
> Yes, we should probably just remove the JSObject code. We added it early on when Rhino was first written and we thought we might need JSObject compatibility with the JS + Java implementation in Navigator 4.x. That's not important now, so we should just remove this code (which likely doesn't work at this point anyway).
git-svn-id: svn://10.0.0.236/trunk@123139 18797224-902f-48f8-a5cc-f745e15eee43
0544f7b57c