Logo
Explore Help
Sign In
Bommels05/Mozilla
Bommels05/Mozilla
1
0
Fork 0
You've already forked Mozilla
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity
Mozilla/mozilla/webtools/bugzilla/t/Support
History
jake%acutex.net ff3e46489b We don't really need to look for fragments that are pulled in by [% INCLUDE %] or [% PROCESS %]. While removing this code bit doesn't allow us to seperatly check that those fragments exist and compile, they'll be checked atomatically when the the template that wants them is run through the process() routine by the 004template.t test. This issue was raised because bug 98707 introduced a [% BLOCK %] element and the syntax for using that is the same as for including a template fragment.
git-svn-id: svn://10.0.0.236/trunk@108008 18797224-902f-48f8-a5cc-f745e15eee43
2001-11-14 03:44:07 +00:00
..
Files.pm
Have the tests test .pm files as well, yes this creates bustage, this is
2001-10-31 01:06:31 +00:00
Systemexec.pm
Bug 103664 - Tests should "use strict;" and not contain any tabs. We should also use the TEST_VERBOSE environment variable instead of VERBOSE.
2001-10-19 22:39:51 +00:00
Templates.pm
We don't really need to look for fragments that are pulled in by [% INCLUDE %] or [% PROCESS %]. While removing this code bit doesn't allow us to seperatly check that those fragments exist and compile, they'll be checked atomatically when the the template that wants them is run through the process() routine by the 004template.t test. This issue was raised because bug 98707 introduced a [% BLOCK %] element and the syntax for using that is the same as for including a template fragment.
2001-11-14 03:44:07 +00:00
Powered by Gitea Version: 1.23.1 Page: 474ms Template: 20ms
English
Bahasa Indonesia Deutsch English Español Français Gaeilge Italiano Latviešu Magyar nyelv Nederlands Polski Português de Portugal Português do Brasil Suomi Svenska Türkçe Čeština Ελληνικά Български Русский Українська فارسی മലയാളം 日本語 简体中文 繁體中文(台灣) 繁體中文(香港) 한국어
Licenses API