This website requires JavaScript.
Explore
Help
Sign In
Bommels05
/
Mozilla
Watch
1
Star
0
Fork
0
You've already forked Mozilla
Code
Issues
Pull Requests
Actions
Packages
Projects
Releases
Wiki
Activity
Mozilla
/
mozilla
/
webtools
/
bugzilla
/
t
/
Support
History
jake%acutex.net
ff3e46489b
We don't really need to look for fragments that are pulled in by [% INCLUDE %] or [% PROCESS %]. While removing this code bit doesn't allow us to seperatly check that those fragments exist and compile, they'll be checked atomatically when the the template that wants them is run through the process() routine by the 004template.t test. This issue was raised because bug 98707 introduced a [% BLOCK %] element and the syntax for using that is the same as for including a template fragment.
...
git-svn-id: svn://10.0.0.236/trunk@108008 18797224-902f-48f8-a5cc-f745e15eee43
2001-11-14 03:44:07 +00:00
..
Files.pm
Have the tests test .pm files as well, yes this creates bustage, this is
2001-10-31 01:06:31 +00:00
Systemexec.pm
Bug 103664 - Tests should "use strict;" and not contain any tabs. We should also use the TEST_VERBOSE environment variable instead of VERBOSE.
2001-10-19 22:39:51 +00:00
Templates.pm
We don't really need to look for fragments that are pulled in by [% INCLUDE %] or [% PROCESS %]. While removing this code bit doesn't allow us to seperatly check that those fragments exist and compile, they'll be checked atomatically when the the template that wants them is run through the process() routine by the 004template.t test. This issue was raised because bug 98707 introduced a [% BLOCK %] element and the syntax for using that is the same as for including a template fragment.
2001-11-14 03:44:07 +00:00