[no ci] Sync issue templates (#220)

.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/bug_report.yml

@@ -0,0 +1,33 @@
+name: Bug report
+description: Create a report to help us improve Modrinth
+labels: [bug]
+body:
+  - type: textarea
+    attributes:
+      label: Describe the bug
+      description: A clear and concise description of what the bug is.
+    validations:
+      required: false
+  - type: textarea
+    attributes:
+      label: Steps to reproduce
+      description: Steps to reproduce the behavior.
+      placeholder: |
+        1. Go to '...'
+        2. Click on '...'
+        3. Scroll down to '...'
+        4. See error
+    validations:
+      required: false
+  - type: textarea
+    attributes:
+      label: Expected behavior
+      description: A clear and concise description of what you expected to happen.
+    validations:
+      required: false
+  - type: textarea
+    attributes:
+      label: Additional context
+      description: Add any other context about the problem here.
+    validations:
+      required: false

.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/enhancement.yml

@@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
+name: Enhancement
+description: Suggest an enhancement for an existing Modrinth feature
+labels: [enhancement]
+body:
+  - type: textarea
+    attributes:
+      label: Is your suggested enhancement related to a problem? Please describe.
+      description: A clear and concise description of what the problem is. Ex. I'm always frustrated when [...]
+    validations:
+      required: false
+  - type: textarea
+    attributes:
+      label: Describe the solution you'd like
+      description: A clear and concise description of what you want to happen.
+    validations:
+      required: false
+  - type: textarea
+    attributes:
+      label: Describe alternatives you've considered
+      description: A clear and concise description of any alternative solutions or features you've considered.
+    validations:
+      required: false
+  - type: textarea
+    attributes:
+      label: Additional context
+      description: Add any other context or screenshots about the suggested enhancement here.
+    validations:
+      required: false