Really use PROCESS instead of INCLUDE for custom fields, see bug 1137307
git-svn-id: svn://10.0.0.236/trunk@265929 18797224-902f-48f8-a5cc-f745e15eee43
This commit is contained in:
@@ -1 +1 @@
|
||||
9382
|
||||
9383
|
||||
@@ -1 +1 @@
|
||||
d82782d4075bdcdbd94319c9ce525249e9b06113
|
||||
0bcbc0faba0a0ed80eab653d3a696764686d202c
|
||||
@@ -982,7 +982,9 @@
|
||||
[%# *** Custom Fields *** %]
|
||||
[% FOREACH field = Bugzilla.active_custom_fields %]
|
||||
<tr>
|
||||
[% INCLUDE bug/field.html.tmpl value = bug.${field.name}
|
||||
[%# Use PROCESS instead of INCLUDE, because extra_field_item is defined
|
||||
# in the template and must be returned back. INCLUDE cannot do that. %]
|
||||
[% PROCESS bug/field.html.tmpl value = bug.${field.name}
|
||||
editable = bug.check_can_change_field(field.name, 0, 1) %]
|
||||
</tr>
|
||||
[% IF extra_field_item %]
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user